|
THE WILDLIFE SOCIETY
5410 Grosvenor Lane • Bethesda, MD 20814-2144
Final Position Statement
Confinement of
Wild Ungulates within High Fences[1]
Demand for hunting and the sale of live wild ungulates (hoofed mammals)
and their products has promoted the growth of an industry that raises
wild native and exotic ungulates in captivity, within managed
properties. High (avg. 2.4 m) fences are used to attempt to control the
movement of animals to improve the management of captive wildlife and
their habitat, reduce immigration of non-managed animals, and as a
deterrent to poaching. Biological issues relating to confined wild
ungulates include behavioral effects of enclosed animals, diseases
associated with confinement and shipping, genetic effects of confinement
and transport from natural ranges, habitat effects, effects on nontarget
species, and effects on native species and habitats outside of the
fence. Ecological health within fenced habitats, however, may increase
when improved effectiveness of population control is combined with
proper captive wildlife and habitat management. Social issues related to
confined ungulates include cultural and legal issues of public versus
private ownership of wildlife resources, hunter ethics, public
perception of hunting, commercialization, and domestication of wild
animals, and ecological stewardship. The use of high fences to confine
ungulates may have specific and legitimate uses in wildlife management
and research, but it also carries the potential for significant adverse
impacts. The policy of The Wildlife Society with respect to ungulate
confinement is to:
1. Recognize the serious biological (diseases, genetic effects, etc.)
and social (public versus private ownership of wildlife, ethics) issues
associated with confinement of wild ungulates.
2. Oppose any additional conversion of the public's native wildlife to
private ownership via high-fenced enclosures.
3. Oppose high-fenced enclosures, regardless of size, if they exclude
free-ranging native wildlife from critical seasonal habitats or
migration routes, or jeopardize the sustainability of free-ranging
native wildlife.
4. Support regulations and enforcement to prevent escapes of confined
animals and facilitate recovery in the event of an escape.
5. Support state and provincial wildlife agencies as the primary
regulatory authority over native North American ungulates, including
those confined by high fences. State and provincial wildlife agencies
should work cooperatively with other state, provincial, and federal
agricultural, wildlife, and health agencies as well as hunting groups,
conservation organizations, private landowners, and managers to reduce
the potential for problems such as disease transmission and genetic
exchange among native wildlife and exotic species.
6. Support the regulation of captive exotic ungulates by state and
provincial wildlife agencies.
7. Encourage anyone using a high fence to confine ungulates to
thoroughly analyze and acknowledge potential impacts to native
free-ranging wildlife species and commit to minimizing any such risks
This requires a well-coordinated effort of state, provincial, and
federal agencies, hunting groups, conservation organizations, private
landowners, and managers.
8. For all ungulates confined by high fences, encourage management at or
below natural carrying capacity in a manner that prevents inbreeding,
diseases, habitat degradation, and effects on non-target species.
9. Encourage authorized agencies to collaborate with interested parties
on funding and development of systems for detecting and monitoring
wildlife diseases within enclosed and free-ranging native and exotic
ungulate populations.
10. Support a moratorium on the construction of high-fenced facilities
and any shipment of live cervids until live-animal diagnostic tests are
available for detecting and monitoring important infectious diseases.
11. Oppose the use of funds generated from traditional sources
(recreational licenses, tags, and other fees) for confined-ungulate
inspections and regulatory programs.
Approved by Council September 2009. Expires September 2014.
Excellence in Wildlife Stewardship Through Science and Education
[1] Refer to the Technical Report on Confinement of Wild Ungulates within High Fences (#02-3) for the scientific rationale on which this position description is based. |
| A Captive Shooter Bull Operation Viewed From Space | ||||
| Selling Our Hunting Heritage | ||||
| Legislative History of Fenced Shooting in North Dakota | ||||
| Hall of Shame | ||||
| Fair Chase Members | ||||
| The Fair Chase Issue | ||||
| Initiative Language | ||||
| The Origin of Fair Chase | ||||
| Writer Curt Wells on Fair Chase | ||||
| The Montana High Fence Experience | ||||
| What You Can Do | ||||
|