|
"One does not hunt in order to kill; on the contrary, one kills in order to have hunted...If one were to present the sportsman with the death of the animal as a gift he would refuse it. What he is after is having to win it, to conquer the surly brute through his own effort and skill with all the extras that this carries with it: the immersion in the countryside, the healthfulness of the exercise, the distraction from his job.
Jose Ortega y Gasset, Meditations on Hunting. |
![]() |
|
The shooting gallery operators can't honestly defend what they do behind their fences, so they resort to deception about the initiated measure ND Hunters for Fair Chase proposes to place in front of the people for a vote.
This language will appear on the ballot, but will not become law. The language above was prepared by the Attorney General and the Secretary of State to serve as a brief outline of the proposed law. The Initiative will not appear on the ballot for one simple reason; some initiated measures are pages long. A ballot simply isn't big enough, hence the Ballot title, a brief outline for the voter in the booth.
The Initiative Language that will become law:
BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA:
SECTION 1. A new section to chapter 36-01 of the North Dakota Century
Code is created and enacted as follows:
Fee killing of certain captive game animals prohibited – Penalty –
Exception. A person is guilty of a class A misdemeanor if the person
obtains fees or other remuneration from another person for the killing
or attempted killing of privately-owned big game species or exotic
mammals confined in or released from any man-made enclosure designed to
prevent escape. This section does not apply to the actions of a
government employee or agent to control an animal population, to prevent
or control diseases, or when government action is otherwise required or
authorized by law.
SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Act becomes effective on November 1,
2012.
**************************************
That is the measure. When passed, the new law will
eliminate canned shooting of captive big-game species inside
escape-proof fences for fees.
The high fence operators insist that the initiative language is vague,
and if passed, will put Bison growers out of business. They insist on
spreading the falsehood that the phrase "big game species" covers all
manner of hairy critters. That is a blatant lie spread by the
shooting gallery operators because they can't muster any legitimate
arguments to support selling a fraudulent "hunt" in lieu of a real hunt
based on fair chase. A principle of American Jurisprudence holds that a statute must be specific. Contrary to what the high fence operators say, the language of the Initiative is specific. The Fair Chase Initiative, like all law, does not stand alone, no more than the roof of a house stands without walls to support it.
|
|
"It does not require many words to speak the truth." Chief Joseph |
THE PUBLIC TRUST DOCTRINE AND THE NORTH AMERICAN MODEL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT |
| A Captive Shooter Bull Operation Viewed From Space | ||||
| Selling Our Hunting Heritage | ||||
| Legislative History of Fenced Shooting in North Dakota | ||||
| Hall of Shame | ||||
| Fair Chase Members | ||||
| The Fair Chase Issue | ||||
| Initiative Language | ||||
| The Origin of Fair Chase | ||||
| Writer Curt Wells on Fair Chase | ||||
| The Montana High Fence Experience | ||||
| What You Can Do | ||||
|